Comparison of Spread Strategies in Cross Margin and Portfolio Margin

When trading options, especially in cryptocurrency markets, understanding margin requirements is crucial for maximizing capital efficiency and minimizing risk. Two common margining systems—cross margin and portfolio margin—handle risk and capital allocation very differently. This article explores how these models impact the execution of bear put spreads, a popular options strategy, using BTC options as a real-world example.

We’ll walk through the mechanics of each system, compare their margin calculations, and highlight why portfolio margin can significantly reduce capital outlay while improving trading flexibility.

Understanding Bear Put Spreads

A bear put spread is an options strategy used when a trader expects a moderate decline in the price of an underlying asset. It involves buying a put option at a higher strike price and simultaneously selling a put option at a lower strike price—both on the same asset and with the same expiration date.

This strategy limits both potential profit and loss, making it ideal for risk-managed directional bets.

Let’s consider a practical example:

• BTC spot price: $20,250
• Trader buys: 1 BTC-22JUL22-20000-P (Put at $20,000 strike)
• Trader sells: 1 BTC-22JUL22-18500-P (Put at $18,500 strike)

Net premium paid: 480 USDC

👉 Discover how advanced margin models can boost your options trading efficiency

Cross Margin: How It Works

In cross margin mode, each options position is treated independently. This means that even though a bear put spread is a hedged strategy, the system does not inherently recognize the offsetting risks between the long and short legs.

Margin Requirements in Cross Margin

• Buying options requires paying the premium.
• Selling options requires posting initial and maintenance margin to cover potential losses.
• The margin for the short leg is calculated based on worst-case loss scenarios, regardless of any long positions that may hedge it.

For the short put (BTC-22JUL22-18500-P), here's how the margin is determined:

Maintenance Margin (MM):

Position MM = [Max(0.03 × Spot, 0.03 × Option Price) + Option Price + 0.2% × Spot] × Qty
            = [Max(607.5, 8.4) + 290 + 40.5] × 1 = 938 USDC

Initial Margin (IM):

Position IM = Max[(Max(0.15×Spot − (Spot − Strike), 0.1×Spot) + Max(Premium, Mark Price)), MM]
             = Max[(Max(3,037.5 − 1,750, 2,025) + 290), 938]
             = Max[(3,037.5 − 1,750 = 1,287.5 → capped at 2,025) + 290, 938]
             = Max[2,315, 938] = **2,315 USDC**

Since the long put only requires the premium (760 USDC), which is paid upfront from available balance, no additional margin is blocked beyond the short leg’s requirement.

✅ Total initial margin blocked in cross margin: ~2,315 USDC

Despite the strategy’s limited risk (maximum loss capped at strike difference minus net premium), the system treats the short option as unhedged—leading to high capital usage.

Portfolio Margin: A Smarter Approach

Portfolio margin evaluates risk at the portfolio level, factoring in correlations, offsets, and overall exposure across all positions. Instead of isolating each leg, it simulates multiple market scenarios to determine the maximum potential loss.

This method recognizes hedging effects and reduces redundant margin requirements.

Key Components in Portfolio Margin Calculation

• Risk Parameter: 15% for BTC options
• Preset Price Ranges: ±3%, ±6%, ..., ±15%
• Preset Volatility Shifts: −28%, 0%, +33%
• Risk Factor: 1.2 (multiplier applied to maintenance margin)

The system runs 33 stress-test scenarios combining price moves and volatility shifts to find the worst-case loss.

From the data:

Thus:

• Maximum Loss = 434.65 USDC
• Contingency Component = 0 (no additional risk flags)
• Maintenance Margin (MM) = 434.65 USDC
• Initial Margin (IM) = MM × Risk Factor = 434.65 × 1.2 = 521.58 USDC

✅ Total initial margin in portfolio margin: ~521.58 USDC

This represents a dramatic reduction—over 77% less margin required compared to cross margin—while maintaining the same market exposure.

👉 See how portfolio margin can unlock more trading power with less capital

Why Portfolio Margin Is More Capital-Efficient

The key advantage of portfolio margin lies in its holistic risk assessment:

Because portfolio margin accounts for how options interact—especially in defined-risk strategies like spreads—it avoids over-collateralizing hedges.

For instance:

• In cross margin: You’re effectively treated as short a naked put.
• In portfolio margin: You’re seen as running a limited-risk spread.

This distinction makes portfolio margin ideal for options spreads, straddles, strangles, and other multi-leg strategies.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Q: What is the main difference between cross margin and portfolio margin?

A: Cross margin evaluates each position individually and doesn't account for hedging across positions. Portfolio margin uses scenario-based stress testing to assess overall portfolio risk, recognizing offsets and reducing redundant margin requirements.

Q: Can I use portfolio margin for all types of options strategies?

A: Yes—especially beneficial for multi-leg strategies like spreads, straddles, and iron condors where risk is capped. It's less impactful for single-leg positions.

Q: How much capital can I save using portfolio margin?

A: In this bear put spread example, portfolio margin reduced initial margin from 2,315 USDC to 521.58 USDC—a savings of about 77%. Actual savings vary by strategy and market conditions.

Q: Is portfolio margin riskier for exchanges or brokers?

A: No—it’s designed to be safer. By simulating extreme market moves and volatility shifts, it often results in more accurate risk modeling than traditional per-position margining.

Q: Do all platforms offer portfolio margin?

A: Not all do. It requires sophisticated risk engines and is typically offered by advanced derivatives platforms that support professional traders.

👉 Start leveraging smarter margin systems today

Final Thoughts

When trading options spreads like the bear put strategy, choosing the right margin model can make a significant difference in capital efficiency and trading agility.

While cross margin is simpler and more widely available, it often blocks excessive capital due to its inability to recognize hedged positions.

On the other hand, portfolio margin leverages advanced risk modeling to reflect true exposure—freeing up capital for more opportunities without increasing systemic risk.

For active options traders, especially those employing defined-risk strategies, switching to portfolio margin isn't just an optimization—it's a strategic advantage.

By understanding how these systems calculate requirements—and where they differ—you can make smarter decisions about leverage, diversification, and risk management in your trading journey.

Core Keywords: bear put spread, portfolio margin, cross margin, options strategy, capital efficiency, BTC options, margin requirements