In recent years, blockchain technology has surged in popularity, revolutionizing digital transactions, financial services, and decentralized applications. As companies race to build platforms around this innovation, a critical legal question has emerged: Can the word "blockchain" be trademarked? This question lies at the heart of a high-profile U.S. lawsuit — Blockchain Luxembourg v. Paymium — which began in 2018 and delivered a pivotal preliminary ruling in August 2019.
This case not only tests the boundaries of trademark law but also has far-reaching implications for how generic technological terms can be claimed as proprietary brands in the digital economy.
👉 Discover how leading platforms protect their digital identity in a competitive market.
The Plaintiff: Blockchain Luxembourg and Its Trademark Claims
Blockchain Luxembourg S.A., a Luxembourg-based company, operates one of the world’s largest digital asset platforms. Through its U.S. subsidiary, it provides secure digital wallets, financial services, and trust solutions to over 28 million users across 140 countries. With more than $200 billion in transaction volume and over 100 million transactions processed, the company has established significant global recognition.
The plaintiff emphasizes that it does not claim exclusive rights to the lowercase term "blockchain", which it acknowledges is a generic descriptor for distributed ledger technology and cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin. Instead, its legal claim centers on the uppercase "BLOCKCHAIN" — used as a distinctive brand since 2011.
Key Trademarks and Brand Usage
Blockchain Luxembourg asserts rights over several marks, all featuring prominent capitalization or design elements:
- BLOCKCHAIN (used since 2011)
- BLOCKCHAIN.INFO (since 2011)
- BLOCKCHAIN.COM (since 2013)
- BLOCKCHAIN MERCHANT (since 2012)
- BLOCKCHAIN PRINCIPAL STRATEGIES (since 2018)
These trademarks are used in connection with digital wallet services, mobile apps, website operations, and software integration tools.
In January 2017, the company began using a stylized design mark of "BLOCKCHAIN" in marketing and interstate commerce. This visual branding appears across its app interfaces, promotional materials, and online services.
A key registered trademark was granted in July 2018 (U.S. Reg. No. 5,512,148), covering services in Classes 9, 35, 36, and 42 — including downloadable apps for cryptocurrency management, cloud-based financial databases, online financial reporting tools, and temporary software access for managing digital assets.
Notably, the registration does not specify color protection, meaning the trademark rights extend beyond any particular visual styling.
Market Recognition and Search Dominance
One of Blockchain’s strongest arguments is consumer perception. When users search “blockchain” on Google, the top organic result is blockchain.com — reinforcing brand association in the public mind. This dominance supports the claim that "BLOCKCHAIN" has acquired secondary meaning, a crucial factor in establishing trademark strength even for terms rooted in common language.
The Defendant: Paymium and the Use of blockchain.io
Paymium, a French fintech firm, previously operated under brands like PAYMIUM and BITCOIN CENTRAL, offering cryptocurrency trading services. In 2018, however, it launched a new initiative using the domain blockchain.io, promoting an initial coin offering (ICO) and positioning itself as a blockchain-based financial platform.
This rebranding sparked immediate controversy. Blockchain Luxembourg alleged that Paymium’s use of "blockchain.io" created consumer confusion — leading investors to believe there was an affiliation between the two companies. Evidence suggested some users did indeed mistake Paymium’s offering as endorsed by Blockchain.com.
Paymium also faced claims of false advertising, as it publicly stated its ICO was “registered” with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The court later found that while Paymium had engaged with the SEC review process, it never formally registered — though this did not constitute outright fraud under the circumstances.
Legal Battle: Generic Term vs. Established Brand
At the heart of the defense was a bold argument: "blockchain" is a generic term, much like "internet" or "email," and therefore unprotectable as a standalone trademark.
Paymium filed a motion to dismiss, arguing that:
- The word "blockchain" merely describes a technology.
- Blockchain Luxembourg had previously acknowledged this by agreeing to disclaim exclusive rights to the word during its 2018 trademark application process.
- The plaintiff’s use of uppercase letters doesn’t transform a generic term into a protectable brand.
Under U.S. trademark law, generic terms cannot be monopolized. However, if a term acquires distinctive secondary meaning through long-term use and public recognition, it may qualify for protection — even if derived from a common word.
Blockchain countered that its consistent use of "BLOCKCHAIN" in uppercase and stylized formats had created strong brand identity independent of the underlying technology term.
👉 See how global innovators secure their digital presence amid rising competition.
Court Ruling: A Win for Trademark Viability
In August 2019, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York issued a preliminary decision:
- The claim of false registration with the SEC was dismissed due to insufficient evidence of intentional deception.
- However, the trademark infringement claim survived.
The court held that whether "BLOCKCHAIN" has acquired secondary meaning and whether "blockchain.io" is confusingly similar are questions of fact, best decided by a jury. Therefore, the case would proceed to trial on the trademark issue.
This outcome affirmed that:
- Even potentially descriptive or generic terms can gain trademark protection through widespread use.
- Visual presentation (e.g., capitalization, design) plays a role in brand distinctiveness.
- Consumer confusion remains central to infringement analysis.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
Can a tech term like "blockchain" be trademarked?
Yes — if it has acquired secondary meaning through extensive use and public recognition. While the generic concept cannot be owned, a company can trademark its specific branding (e.g., uppercase "BLOCKCHAIN") when consumers associate it with a particular source.
What is secondary meaning in trademark law?
Secondary meaning occurs when consumers no longer see a term as just descriptive but instead link it directly to one company. Evidence includes advertising spend, user base size, media coverage, and search engine dominance.
Why did Paymium’s motion to dismiss fail?
Because questions about consumer perception — such as whether two marks are confusingly similar or whether a term has become distinctive — require factual investigation best handled by a jury.
Does capitalizing a word make it trademarkable?
Not automatically. But consistent use in uppercase or stylized form can help establish brand identity and support claims of distinctiveness over time.
What happens if Blockchain wins the full trial?
It could set a precedent allowing companies to protect branded versions of widely used tech terms — influencing how firms name products in emerging industries like AI, Web3, and DeFi.
How does this affect other blockchain startups?
Startups must carefully evaluate naming strategies. Using common terms like "blockchain" carries risk unless clearly differentiated in branding, design, or domain structure.
Final Thoughts: Branding in the Digital Age
The Blockchain v. Paymium case underscores a growing tension in intellectual property law: balancing open technological language with corporate branding rights. As innovation accelerates, so too will disputes over who controls the vocabulary of the future.
For businesses operating in blockchain and fintech spaces, this case highlights the importance of:
- Early trademark filings
- Consistent brand presentation
- Building consumer recognition
- Avoiding potentially confusing naming practices
While "blockchain" as a concept remains free for all to use, how it's presented matters — and may determine who owns its commercial future.
👉 Stay ahead in the digital economy by understanding how top platforms manage brand and innovation.